Ruth vs. Orpah: How Two Sisters-in-Law Became the Ancestors of David and Goliath

Everyone knows how Ruth’s story goes. Two widowed daughters-in-law, one mother-in-law with nothing left to offer them, and a choice: go home to Moab and start over, or stay with Naomi and walk into an uncertain future in a foreign land. Orpah kisses Naomi goodbye and goes home. Ruth clings to her and says the words that get read at half the weddings in Christian history — “wherever you go, I will go.”

Everyone also knows how David and Goliath goes. A shepherd boy chosen by God, a nine-foot Philistine giant, five smooth stones, over before it really starts.

What almost nobody puts together is that ancient Jewish tradition ties these two stories into one family history, and turns the most famous duel in the Old Testament into a rematch nobody saw coming.

The wordplay that started it

In 2 Samuel 21, there’s a short list of four Philistine giants killed by David and his men, Goliath among them. The text calls them “sons of ha-Rapha” — usually translated as “the giant.” But the rabbis of the Talmud (the vast body of ancient rabbinic teaching and legal debate, compiled over centuries) noticed something: in Hebrew, “Harapha” shares three of its four consonants with “Orpah.”

That’s more than a coincidence to them. It’s a key. The rabbis identify Orpah, the daughter-in-law who went home to Moab, as the mother of Goliath and his three brothers. If you want to read it for yourself, their description of Orpah’s activities after she left Naomi is pretty negative.

Kissed vs. clung

The Talmud doesn’t stop at the wordplay. It draws out the moral. Ruth 1:14 uses two different verbs to describe the sisters-in-law’s parting: Orpah kissed Naomi goodbye, and Ruth clung to her. One rabbi puts it almost like a line of prophecy: the descendants of the one who kissed would one day fall by the hand of the descendants of the one who clung.

That’s the whole shape of 1 Samuel 17. A giant descended from the woman who turned back, defeated by a shepherd descended from the woman who stayed.

The tradition even ties in the small details. Goliath taunts Israel for forty days before David shows up (1 Samuel 17:16) or rather his punishment is delayed for forty days. The rabbis read this as an echo of the forty paces Orpah is said to have walked alongside Naomi before finally turning around. And Orpah herself, according to a separate rabbinic tradition, is later killed by David’s own general, while trying to protect one of her sons in battle.

Worth saying plainly

None of this is in the Bible text itself. It’s midrash; the rabbinic practice of reading Scripture closely enough to notice a repeated word or a near-matching name, and building a teaching out of the connection. You don’t have to take it as literal genealogy for the point to land. Whether or not Goliath was, biologically, Orpah’s son, the rabbis were making a real observation: two women stood at the same fork in the road, made two understandably different choices, and one generation later those choices had grown into Israel’s greatest king and its most notorious enemy.

And Ruth’s line doesn’t stop at David. Matthew 1 places her in the genealogy of Jesus. The woman who clung instead of turning back isn’t just the ancestor of the giant-slayer. She’s an ancestor of the one who defeated something bigger than a giant. Jesus didn’t just go to the cross and take our sins away. He went down into Hades and took the keys of death and the grave (Revelation 1:18, Ephesians 4:8-9). A lot of men and women of God went to heaven that day. It must have been amazing to see the parade of saints like David, Joshua, Caleb, and others marching into heaven.

But I digress. The moral of this story is the question we need to keep asking ourselves: where do we tend to kiss and turn back, instead of clinging like we should? Even in my own life, I’m certain there are more times than can be counted on one hand. But the next time, perhaps you and I will have the strength to cling where we just want to let go.

Other Posts You Might Like